- For the province, see Sulu
The Sultanate of Sulu is a Muslim state that ruled over much of the islands of the Sulu Sea, in the southern Philippines. The sultanate was founded in 1450, but other sources place the date earlier. Muslim historians believe that it had existed centuries earlier in the time of Raja Baguinda Ali.
At its peak, it stretched over the islands that bordered the western peninsula of Mindanao in the east, to the modern Malaysia|Malaysian state of Sabah (formerly North Borneo) in the west and south, and to Palawan in the north.
Currently the issue if who would be the legitimate Sultan of Sulu is disputed by several branches of the Royal Family. Although the line of succession falls on the Kiram branch of Royal family since 1823 up to the death of the last sovereign Sultan in 1936.
To understand more about "the real heirs" to the Sulu Sultanate, must analyze the;
1. The Sulu Sultanate Flag with "2 Weapons symbols" (The long-sword & the Spear), and, 2. Understand the concept of the Sulu Sultanate earlier Protocol System or "The Tartib".
Because, without analyzing the 2 above matters, the searching of "The rights heirs" to the Sulu throne will be in chaos, as what had been happened from now and then in the Sulu Sultanate kingdom.
During the 1450s, Shari'ful Hashem Syed Abu Bakr, an Arab born in Johore, arrived in Sulu from Malacca. In 1457, he founded the Sultanate of Sulu; he then renamed himself "Paduka Maulana Mahasari Sharif Sultan Hashem Abu Bakr". "Paduka" is a local term for "Master". "Mahasari" for "His Majesty".
In 1703 (other sources say 1658), the Sultanate of Sulu received North Borneo from the Sultan of Brunei, after Sulu sent aid against a rebellion in Brunei. In the same year, Sulu gave Palawan to Qudarat, Sultan of Maguindanao, who married a Sulu princess, and formed an alliance with Sulu. Sultan Qudarat eventually ceded Palawan to the Spanish Empire in 1705.
British Acquisition of North Borneo
Template:History of Malaysia In 1865, the United States Consul to Brunei, Claude Lee Moses obtained a 10-year lease for the territory of North Borneo from the Brunei. However, post-Civil War United States wanted nothing to do with Asian colonies, so Moses sold his rights to the Hong Kong-based American Trading Company. Besieged with financial difficulties, the company had to its right on North Borneo Consul of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in Hong Kong, Baron Von Overbeck. Von Overbeck managed to get a 10-year renewal of the lease from the Temenggong of Brunei, and a similar treaty from the Sultan of Sulu on January 22, 1878.
To finance his plans for North Borneo, Overbeck found financial backing from the Dent brothers - Alfred and Edward Dent. However, he was unable to interest his government in the territory. Von Overbeck withdrew in 1880, leaving Alfred Dent in control. Dent was supported by Sir Rutherford Alcock, and Admiral Sir Harry Keppel.
In July 1881, Alfred Dent and his brother formed the British North Borneo Provisional Association Ltd and obtained an official Royal Charter November 1 the same year. In May 1882, the British North Borneo Company|British North Borneo Chartered Company replaced the Provisional Association. Sir Rutherford Alcock became the first president, and Alfred Dent became managing director.
In spite of some diplomatic protests by the Dutch, Spanish and Sarawak governments, the British North Borneo Company proceeded to organize settlement and administration of the territory. The company subsequently acquired further sovereign and territorial rights from the sultan of Brunei, expanding the territory under control to the, Putatan river in May 1884, the Padas district in November 1884, the Kawang river in February 1885, the Mantanani islands in April 1885 and additional minor Padas territories in March 1898.
In 1888, North Borneo together with Sarawak and Brunei became a protectorate of Great Britain. Its administration however remained entirely in the hands of the British North Borneo Company, with the crown reserving only control of foreign relations.
A Jan. 7, 1883, letter from the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Lord Franville confirms the position that the “takeover” of the British of the Sulu, a Sabah property was a lease, not a purchase.
It states: "The British Charter [representing the British North Borneo Company] therefore differs essentially from the previous Charters granted by the Crown... in the fact that the Crown in the present case assumes no dominion or sovereignty over the territories occupied by the Company, nor does it purport to grant to the Company powers of government thereover; it merely conveys upon the persons associated the status and incidents of a body corporate, and recognizes the grants of territory and the powers of government made and delegated by the Sultan in whom the sovereignty remains vested. It differs also from previous Charters in that it prohibits instead of grants a general monopoly of trade.
"As regards the general features of the undertaking, it is to be observed that the territories granted to the Company have been for generations under the government of the Sultanate of Sulu and Brunei, with whom Great Britain has had Treaties of Peace and Commerce."
In retrospect, the British Foreign Affairs communiqué conceded that the matter of sovereignty remained vested in the Sultan of Sulu and could not be delegated to any party because the Deed of 1878 expressly prohibited it.
Prince Rodinhood H.J. Kiram, eldest son of Mohammad Julaspi Kiram maintained that the British must return Sabah to its rightful owner after it knew in 1883 that the disputed territory was never sold, bequeathed, given, or donated to any person or entity, but was merely leased to the Britons with an honest intent of recovering it at an appropriate time in the future.
He declared, "The British had no legal right to give the private property of the Sultan of Sulu to Malaysia. The reason is that there was a lease contract between the Sultan and the British Borneo Company of the British government in 1878 so that the property must be returned back directly to the Sultan of Sulu and not to Malaysia... [And that the] only solution to this problem is that the British government and the Malaysian government must return the private property of the Sultan of Sulu which is Sabah to prevent bloodshed, just like Hong Kong which (was) returned by the British to China (on July 1,) 1997."
Perhaps the thorniest item in the Sabah / Sulu agenda was whether the Overbeck-Dent pact with the Sultan of Sulu was a lease or sale (Padjak=Lease). Scholarly sources, including those officially issued by Britain and the US, pointed out that the sovereignty over Sabah, as stipulated in the Philippine claim, was never, at any time in the past and present, relinquished in favor of any person, organization, or entity. Legally and technically, it remained to this day as the exclusive property of the heirs of the sultanate of Sulu. This statement confirms the observation that the transfer of rights made by the lessees to the British North Borneo Company was ab initio flawed and illegal.
Specifically, the Deed of 1878 clearly mentioned that "the rights and powers hereby leased shall not be transferred to another nation or a company of other nationality" without the consent of the Sultanate of Brunei and the Sultanate of Sulu. This was the same theme discussed in 1963 when a negotiation was made in London with Britain for the recovery of North Borneo. The British, in defense of their own argument, insisted the covenant entered into by Overbeck and Dent with Sulu Sultan Hadji Mohammad Jamalul Kiram was a sale, not a lease. *Even for example the Kiram families (First heir-apparent) were sold the North-Borneo, if the second heir-apparent (Maharajah Adinda families) was not "Initial" the agreement, the lands of North-Borneo could not be declared was sold. Due the Sulu Sultanate kingdom were belongs to the "Two heirs" (The first and the second heir apparent).
What came out as a strong proof in favor of the sultanate was when US Governor General Francis B. Harrison, on Feb. 27, 1947, furnished Philippine vice-president and foreign affairs secretary Elpidio Quirino a photostat copy of the lease document, which was later translated from Malay language and the Arabic script by Profession H. Otley Bayer of UP.
Moreover, Overbeck and Dent, in a statement before the Royal Colonial Institute on May 12, 1885, admitted that the deal they forged with the rightful owners of Sabah did not forfeit the sovereign rights of the Sultan of Sulu and Brunei over the territories administered by the British Borneo Company.
Dent declared openly: "As to the Charter, some friends of the enterprise seem to believe that the enormous powers we hold were given by Her Majesty the Queen. It is not so at all. All our powers were derived entirely from the Sultan of Brunei and Sulu, and what the British Government did was simply to incorporate us by Royal Charter, thus recognizing our powers, which recognition is to us, of course, of vital importance."
North Borneo became part of Malaysia as the state of Sabah in 1963.
- Further information: Moro Rebellion
- Sabah dispute
- Sultanate of Malacca
- Sultanate of Maguindanao
- List of Sultans of Sulu
- Kiram-Bates Treaty
- John C. Bates
Http://www.webalice.it/paopadd / PANJI -Flags and Symbols of the Royal Sultanates of Sulu, Ranao Area and Maguindanao . by paopadd